Originally Posted by
Tiay
oh, well, i'm passionate about human rights. deal with it.
vash: from what I read types 1 and 2 female circumcision mostly do not remove the entire clit, and the females are still able to orgasm, just need more stim. That could be the misunderstanding here. Anyway, you're right we've pretty much said everything that can be said on this theme. also; I did not mean to accuse you of 'drawing it out', actually, I can't help but argue back even when I said I wouldn't. so yeah, let's call it a day.
I believe the equivelent would be removal of the clitoral hood, not the clitoris.
And I still feel to compare the two is a gross absurdity. There is NO medical benefit to female circumcision, and even if you don't think the benefits are significant, ther ARE medical benefits to male circumcision.
Anyway, I don't think calling circumcision a "human rights violation" is appropriate when this thread is about a kid who may very well need one.