Thread: The Perfect Woman [NSFW]

I bet she is Estonian.

having sex with her would give you rugburns

Originally Posted by anachronistic

If you look at the vagina as if it were just some kind of void, some kind of flap to stick your cock into, of course it is not that great.

I think the vagina is very beautiful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Boobaa. You should know this, as an artist.

Just take the way it is designed; so complex... folded in a certain way to accommodate a penis... to provide just the right amount of friction to induce an orgasm; between a woman's legs, as if it were some kind of secret...

Being an artist means also looking things from realistic perspective. A good artist has the ability to look from any perspective and to have the ability to choose the perspective. You could view the clitoris as a cold flappy object, compared to a peeled off chicken skin, just an object with no attachments to the body or its function. You could compare it to the sac of turkey (which of course also has its own beauty) or simply imagine it attached on the back of an okapi. Forget the womans legs.

Btw, do you find vultures beautiful?



Your thought, lilwig, that it is designed for the shape of penis, is still for its function. If you didn't know what it is and view it on any arbitary moment, see all the fluids slowly drip out of it, some bubblyskin just hanging on the top.. just like some sticky nest or something that some people consider gross on the first moment.
My point is that beauty is dependent on the comparison and the extremes. Artists job, in my opinion, is to place himself as an objective viewer. When i describe humans, I often try to describe them as I am not human. I find it interesting to sometimes distance from the close interraction and view everything from far away as a cold still pile of meat, and still find the beauty in that situation, how that pile of meat can acquire a meaning and become beautiful. If I am thinking about a woman and the vagina attached to it, I sure find it very beautiful. Or even its shape alone, pored in gypsum, for example, can be very beautiful, but then it is not as is.

Comparison:




And something a bit irrevelant but fascinating:

Originally Posted by boobaa

Being an artist means also looking things from realistic perspective. A good artist has the ability to look from any perspective and to have the ability to choose the perspective. You could view the clitoris as a cold flappy object, compared to a peeled off chicken skin, just an object with no attachments to the body or its function. You could compare it to the sac of turkey (which of course also has its own beauty) or simply imagine it attached on the back of an okapi. Forget the womans legs.

Btw, do you find vultures beautiful?



Your thought, lilwig, that it is designed for the shape of penis, is still for its function. If you didn't know what it is and view it on any arbitary moment, see all the fluids slowly drip out of it, some bubblyskin just hanging on the top.. just like some sticky nest or something that some people consider gross on the first moment.
My point is that beauty is dependent on the comparison and the extremes. Artists job, in my opinion, is to place himself as an objective viewer. When i describe humans, I often try to describe them as I am not human. I find it interesting to sometimes distance from the close interraction and view everything from far away as a cold still pile of meat, and still find the beauty in that situation, how that pile of meat can acquire a meaning and become beautiful. If I am thinking about a woman and the vagina attached to it, I sure find it very beautiful. Or even its shape alone, pored in gypsum, for example, can be very beautiful, but then it is not as is.

In that case, no part of a woman is beautiful. Eyes? Nope. Imagine them out of the head, just a single eyeball... bloody... lips? Nope. Full, wrinkly, bunch of skin.

The point is, the vagina is part of a woman and I don't have to separate it from her in order to not see it's beauty.

Oh you can view whole woman as a distant raw object, yes. That was my point. The extremes were there just to illustrate it, make it bright and red. So far, you have viewed it from human viewpoint.

Originally Posted by boobaa

Being an artist means also looking things from realistic perspective. A good artist has the ability to look from any perspective and to have the ability to choose the perspective. You could view the clitoris as a cold flappy object, compared to a peeled off chicken skin, just an object with no attachments to the body or its function. You could compare it to the sac of turkey (which of course also has its own beauty) or simply imagine it attached on the back of an okapi. Forget the womans legs.

Btw, do you find vultures beautiful?



Your thought, lilwig, that it is designed for the shape of penis, is still for its function. If you didn't know what it is and view it on any arbitary moment, see all the fluids slowly drip out of it, some bubblyskin just hanging on the top.. just like some sticky nest or something that some people consider gross on the first moment.
My point is that beauty is dependent on the comparison and the extremes. Artists job, in my opinion, is to place himself as an objective viewer. When i describe humans, I often try to describe them as I am not human. I find it interesting to sometimes distance from the close interraction and view everything from far away as a cold still pile of meat, and still find the beauty in that situation, how that pile of meat can acquire a meaning and become beautiful. If I am thinking about a woman and the vagina attached to it, I sure find it very beautiful. Or even its shape alone, pored in gypsum, for example, can be very beautiful, but then it is not as is.

I'm not interested in debating the qualities of an artist, boobaa. Lol, honestly, you are questioning things that I have came to conclusion for years ago.

Like I said, it's all about how you look at it. I don't see it as an odd lump of skin. It does not look like a turkey gizzard to me. I see folds of skin, I can see it from a physical perspective, but the way it looks to me is beautiful.

What is reality, boobaa? I don't think there is a universal definition. What is normal? I don't think there is a definition for that, either.

And do I find vultures beautiful?... in comparison to what? Just in nature? Sure, that's beautiful.

Originally Posted by shh!

Oh my god, that is one hairy vagina! It looks like she glued a rug to her pelvis.

LOL, seriously. It looks like a nest. I half expect baby birds to pop out.

Originally Posted by anachronistic

I'm not interested in debating the qualities of an artist, boobaa. Lol, honestly, you are questioning things that I have came to conclusion for years ago.

Like I said, it's all about how you look at it. I don't see it as an odd lump of skin. It does not look like a turkey gizzard to me. I see folds of skin, I can see it from a physical perspective, but the way it looks to me is beautiful.

What is reality, boobaa? I don't think there is a universal definition. What is normal? I don't think there is a definition for that, either.

And do I find vultures beautiful?... in comparison to what? Just in nature? Sure, that's beautiful.

It seems we are talking about different concepts of reality here. I am talking about cold empirism, normality (logical assumptions) has nothing to do with it. Don't put words in my mouth.

Originally Posted by boobaa

It seems we are talking about different concepts of reality here. I am talking about cold empirism, normality (logical assumptions) has nothing to do with it. Don't put words in my mouth.

I bet you'd rather have a nice, big dick.

Originally Posted by Cain

I bet you'd rather have a nice, big dick.

Can I cut yours?

Originally Posted by boobaa

Can I cut yours?

You're a kinky little devil.

go suck a bag of dicks.

very interesting pictures
Thank You