A staircase is created with 10 blocks and 4 steps. The goal is to relate the number of blocks, N, with the number of steps, S, for any staircase in an algebraic formula.

No handbooks/texts/google

Maybe this is not the kind of thing people find interesting? There are plenty of little puzzles like these I can post but if no one cares then why bother

__________________
Hazard to Others

I love stuff like this, but I'm not doing your homework, am I?

__________________
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They would never make a weapon that kills, no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while.

I'm in calculus II so we wouldn't be doing this. But this can be solved by applying some type of integration

__________________
Hazard to Others

Okay. But isn't this just calcing the sum of a basic arthmetic sequence, tho? You asked for the number of blocks.

S=1+2+3+4+5... etc.

__________________
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They would never make a weapon that kills, no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while.

No, the number of blocks in relation to the number of step or the number of steps in relation to the number of blocks

The first being easier

I gotta go finish my chem and math homework though and eat dinner with the homies I'll be back later tonight

__________________
Hazard to Others

Meaning that you want the to know how many total blocks you need to build, say, 23 steps? Or you want to know # of blocks under a *specific* step? Are you assuming the length/height of the step is a fixed postitive integer value (i.e. I can't stack blocks staggered over 1/2 a step & the block size is constant).

__________________
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They would never make a weapon that kills, no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while.

hmmm..from what i think you are asking....i believe its:

(S-1)S + S = N
-------
2

S>1

Check if it works...haven't done calculus for a long time.

Oh.

My.

God.

If this is the kind of shit I have to do to get some kind of electrical engineering degree...

F*CK.

THAT.

__________________

Heil Frasbee

Ya, this this is what I was also saying (except your constant of 1/2 would just be the generic d constant for all cases), but he didn't seem to think an arithmetic series was what he wanted. And I wouldn't really call this calculus. Confused, b/c I think ^this is correct.

__________________
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They would never make a weapon that kills, no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while.

anyone care for a beer?? i've got an extra 6 that i won't drink.

raverboy

__________________
...this is just my perspective on the situation...

Yeah lastwish solved for number of blocks in terms of S, which can be easily modified with the quadratic equation to get S in terms of N.

But the point was to show how you solved for it because there are many ways. The method using calculus is one someone else pointed out to me, not a method I would have used but works

The way I solved it was this:

N(1) = 1 when S = 1

N(2) = 3 = N(1) + 2 when S = 2

N(3) = 6 = N(2) + 3 when S = 3

N(4) = 10 = N(3) + 4 when S = 4

Which is just a summation-

_______S
N(S) = ∑ i
_______i=1
(ignore __)

Which has the closed form expression of

N(S) = 1 + 2 + 3 + …. + (S – 1) + S

Adding this to itself and dividing by 2 (taking the average)-

N(S) = 1 + 2 + … + (S – 1) + S

N(S) = S + (S – 1) + ….. + 2 + 1

2N(S) = (S + 1) + (S + 1) +…..+ (S + 1)

dividing by 2 to get N(S) = S(S + 1) / 2 since there are S terms. Luckily this expansion is well known so I didn’t need to derive it again

Lastwish what method did you use to arrive at your answer?

__________________
Hazard to Others

LOL, this^ is what I said DM.

I just remembered the basic formula, tho, didn't work it out from first principles.

What was the calculus method?

__________________
A woman would never make a nuclear bomb. They would never make a weapon that kills, no, no. They'd make a weapon that makes you feel bad for a while.

You suck at drawing.



No hard feelings.

__________________
If you stare at a white pixel long enough, you notice the throbbing red, green, and blue elements that create it.

If you stare at a fuzzy blanket long enough with your eye so close it goes out of focus, just look at the sparkles; you can see it on the cellular level.

lol. You don't need calculus or any formula to solve this question. I used a rather primative method. I just visualized the steps as a full cube and saw that there are patterns as you increase the number of steps. This is from a humanity and social science student. Not a math and life science person.